I often wonder about what language is "the best". It's fun to think about these things theoretically.
I believe that there are two relevant ways of expressing meaning in a language: syntax, idioms, and libraries. Syntax is direct meaning and the compiler won't let you write bad syntax. Idioms are common ways of using language features to solve common problems. Libraries solve big problems that requires lots of code, and abstract it into a simple interface, a new syntax.
Discussing just the library side of languages -
If a language has very powerful standard syntax, newbies will try to solve all of a language's problems with the language's standard syntactic tools. If a languages has fewer syntactic tools, then the newbie will be forced to either write lots of code to solve simple problems, or to dig into the language's community and common libraries to solve problems.
I argue that it is theoretically better to have a language with less complex syntax and a stronger community-maintained set of libraries that solve common problems. Such as Lisp/Clojure, where the language's entire functionality is constituted of its libraries. This way, if you attempt to solve a problem, you are reinventing very little, but rather, you are subscribing to an existing solution to the problem.
When others come to look at your code later on, they can see what solution you chose to subscribe to. Even better, your solution/library has a name attached to it, and that name can be Googled to find much more information about that solution on that library's website or IRC channel.